Evaluation packs · 20 documents · 4 finalists
One pack per finalist × team. Every claim cites the bid PDF. Reviewers approve or raise concerns — concerns are consolidated and dispatched to the vendor for response.
Packs generated
20
AI generated
Reviewer approvals
7
of 20
In review
6
across 5 teams
Concerns raised
1
pending resolution
Pack matrix
Finalists × review teams
Feedback loop
Concerns & clarifications
CTW
Calix
1 concern
- significantTechnical Review
Bid §3.7 declares RIP (Resin-Impregnated Paper) bushings as an alternative to the OIP specification in S-ELE-TRF Rev 4. Per §A2, this deviation requires an Engineering Director sign-off letter confirming RIP equivalence — not included in the current submission.
Requested: Engineering Director sign-off letter confirming RIP bushing equivalence per S-ELE-TRF Rev 4 §A2
OpenView pack
Reviewer teams
5- Open portalTechnical ReviewEquipment compliance, spec deviations, FAT/SAT plan, technical risk.Eng. Hamad Al-Suwaidi · Eng. Maryam Al-Hashemi
- Open portalIT & CommunicationsSCADA / DCS compatibility, IEC 61850 protocols, firmware, cybersecurity.Eng. Saif Al-Dhaheri · Eng. Omar Al-Mazroui
- Open portalHSEHSE record, method statements, COSHH, personnel certifications, incident history.Eng. Khaled Al-Romaithi · Layla Al-Sharhan
- Open portalProcurement & CommercialPrice analysis, payment milestones, delivery risk, warranty, change-order risk.Eng. Ahmed Al-Mansoori · Faisal Al-Shehhi
- Open portalLegalT&Cs, liability cap, jurisdiction, performance bond adequacy, termination rights.Latifa Al-Yousuf · Mark Henderson
Award timeline
target: 2026-05-15- Evaluation packs distributed30 Apr 2026, 11:23 GST
- Reviewer approvals lock08 May 2026, 17:00 GST
- Award memo · senior approver12 May 2026
- Award notification dispatched15 May 2026